Project Presentations
For a full list of ARM project presentations,
please click here.
In the 2007 ARM presentations were organised around the
four themes of the ARM. Presenters were instructed to give brief but punchy presentations on the highlights of their GCP project in 2006, emphasising results and impact, as opposed to concepts or methodology. Our portfolio has expanded and now numbers about 70 projects. As in past Annual Research Meetings, brainstorming sessions were maintained to address strategic issues for GCP. With our projects now maturing and generating results, we are increasingly moving from concepts to achievements, and as such PIs were given the Project Presentation Guidelines below:
A poster session with a twist
Poster winners
Poster Abstracts
The 2007 ARM featured a poster session, grouped by the four ARM themes, was facilitated by Theo van Hintum, Subprogramme 4 leader. The session proved to be a central and integral part of the ARM, being incorporated into the formal programme and with four hours being dedicated in two separate 2-hour sessions on the
13th September and
15th September.
Poster presentations were composed of one or two posters (maximum) per project. Each poster was required to be 70cm x 110cm in size, and the scope was as follows:
- Ongoing projects: specific key results or new approaches (emphasising impact, not a summary of the project).
- New projects: a general introduction to the new project.
The 2007 poster session was markedly different from that of previous years. Each and every presenter was given the opportunity to briefly introduce their poster at plenary to the audience. The session was dubbed ‘Say it succinctly in sixty seconds’. Each poster was introduced by the author(s) in a timed one-minute presentation—and not a second more! This was the presenter's window to tell the audience what the poster was about, and why they should come to view it. For every poster, we allowed only one old-fashioned transparency—but absolutely no PowerPoint slides. Beyond this, we decided to leave how presenters used their one minute entirely up to them, only encouraging them to employ any means deemed necessary to lure an audience to the poster! Participants were invited to give their creativity and imagination complete free rein. A vote to identify the best poster for each of the four themes was subsequently organised.
GCP was delighted to announce the following as the four winning posters:
Theme 1:
Poster 1.5 Characterization and Transferring of resistance genes to Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) from African cultivated rice (O. glaberrima) to O. sativa by molecular markers
Presenter: Deless Thiemele
Authors: Deless Thiemele*, Laurence ALBAR, Sophie Perez, Séverin Ake, Marie-Noëlle Ndjiondjop, Yacouba Sere, Alain Ghesquiere
*UMR « Génome et Développement des Plantes »,IRD/CNRS/Université de Perpignan, IRD, France /Laboratoire de Physiologie Végétale, Université de Cocody, Côte-d'Ivoire.
Theme 2:
Poster 2.9 Near-isogenic lines for disease QTL in maize
Presenter: R.J. Nelson
Authors: J. Zwonitzer,* C.-L. Chung, J. Longfellow, R.J. Nelson, and P. Balint-Kurti
*North Carolina State University
Theme 3:
Poster 3.13 Marker Development and Marker-Assisted Selection for Striga Resistance in Cowpea
Presenter: S. Muranaka
Authors: S. Muranaka,* M. P. Timko, N. Cisse, M. Wade, C. Fatokun, A. Raji, D. J. Kim and B. Ousmane
*IITA, Nigeria
Theme 4:
Poster 4.5 Characterization of Maize germplasm found in Ghana, using the bulking technique
Presenter: A.Oppong
Authors: A.Oppong,* M..Warburton, M. Ewool, R. Thompson, K. Poku-Sekyere, J.N.L. Lamptey, M.D. Quain.
*CSIR-Crops Research Institute, Ghana
And the special prize went to....Sato Muranaka for his particularly creative and entertaining presentation of the poster
3.13 Marker Development and Marker-Assisted Selection for Striga Resistance in Cowpea.
Please join us in congratulating the poster winners!
<< back to top >>