GCP Reviews and evaluations

• 2011
• Review by European Commission, February 2011 - final report
• 2010
• Review by European Commission, November-December 2010 - final report
• SiMAC report
• 2008
• Report of the First External Review of the Generation Challenge Programme (EPMR)
• Response from the Programme Steering Committee and the Management Team of the Generation Challenge Programme to the External Review report and PSC Response to the EPMR Review

• Science Council of the CGIAR Commentary on the 1st External Review of the Generation Challenge Programme

• CGIAR Secretariat’s Comments on the Governance and Management Aspects of the Report of the First External Review of Generation Challenge Programme (GCP) 

• European Commission Report 2008 

• 2008 Annual Research Meeting results
  Summary of results and actions: In a marked difference to the 2007 ARM survey, this year's version focused entirely on the ARM, with the exception of one open, non-ARM-related question, which addressed the crucial question of future investments, as follows:
  
  One of the purposes of the ARM is to map and/or validate future directions in terms of GCP’s investments in research. From what you gathered at the ARM, please state one clear area that you consider GCP should invest in as a top priority.
  
  Clustering the open-ended responses, we can report that nearly half of the respondents (44%) indicated breeding tools as the top priority for future investments. View full survey results

• 2007
• Evaluation of EC Contribution to the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Country Note--Generation Challenge Programme, CIMMYT, Mexico 
• 2007 Annual Research Meeting Survey Results